The existence of debate on this subject worries me more than China itself. It signifies the threat is within. To many, the 1st or any amendment to the Bill of R

The existence of debate on this subject worries me more than China itself. It signifies the threat is within. To many, the 1st or any amendment to the Bill of Rights is modifiable at the whim of each meandering generation or trend. We've steadily watched them erode, most notably for me, Habeas corpus and number 4. I don't want to start an argument here, but it seems that rights modifiable through caprice are doomed. Some things (but few) ought be impervious.