4 ms·
The issue that resulted in the crashes was angle of attack sensors reporting broken data, which caused MCAS to nose down the plane; this is absolutely not what
by bonzini 7y ago
The issue that resulted in the crashes was angle of attack sensors reporting broken data, which caused MCAS to nose down the plane; this is absolutely not what the pilots are talking about.
Everything else that has been discussed (whether the pilots should have been told how to disable it and tried it in the simulator, whether Boeing should have added the second vane or even a third one on all planes, etc.) fundamentally depends on having incorrect data from the sensors and the plane not being able to deal with that.
The exchange might hint that MCAS had an awful design history, but even a perfect MCAS could have had issues if supplied with incorrect sensor data; garbage in, garbage out. Now if there was somewhere an email about the lack of a voting system on vane readings, that would be another story.
- mannykannot 7y agoThe issue is the undocumented (and obfuscated) behavior of the airplane after the failure of a single AofA sensor.
- bonzini 7y agoRight, and it has nothing to do with the issue reported by the test pilots in the simulator.
- mannykannot 7y agoI see what you mean - there is no evidence (at least in the transcript) that the problems were in response to a simulated system failure, and the actual MCAS seemed to work well enough when nothing was broken.