3 ms·
Well, red in nature doesn't always need to mean blood. It can also be a signal to other animals, even if they don't have red blood. Red is pretty hard to camo
by cbanek 7y ago
Well, red in nature doesn't always need to mean blood. It can also be a signal to other animals, even if they don't have red blood. Red is pretty hard to camouflage in nature, and it really stands out.
Sometimes it's for attracting, such as red apples, fruit/berries, or flowers. By attracting other animals, it helps the signaler.
Sometimes it's to signal danger, as in red poisonous mushrooms, or animals that have red bodies and are toxic or don't taste good. ("don't eat me")
I guess what I'm saying is that red was a signal long before humans came on the scene, and I think we are still on the look out for it because of those same evolutionary clues.
- Iv 7y agoFalse positives are not a big deal for this trait. False negatives are. A spat of blood may not mean danger, but if it systematically put you on your guards, you are likely to get an advantages over individuals who are oblivious to it.