4 ms·
Too bad they lost you there, since a few paragraphs down they link to their 2018 study showing that the number is apparently closer to 4%.
by airza 7y ago
Too bad they lost you there, since a few paragraphs down they link to their 2018 study showing that the number is apparently closer to 4%.
- andy_ppp 7y agoSo that’s just not true because times haven’t dropped 4% have they?
- bookofjoe 7y agoMine did once I got these shoes, in all distances from 5K to half-marathon.
- notacoward 7y agoTop times have not, but the charts in the article clearly show a 3-4% difference across the entire data set. Why are you so determined to ignore data?
- andy_ppp 7y agoOkay fair enough, do we know why the top times haven’t changed so much, it would be interesting to know why.
- gamblor956 7y agoMost top marathoners are not sponsored by Nike and don't wear its shoes. Those that do, like Galen Rupp, have not completed many marathons since the shoes were introduced but did see improvements in the probs of the races they ran before dropping out.