9 ms·

"WRONG! It is factually correct that Linux beats illumos in performance." I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. "You can continue to

"WRONG! It is factually correct that Linux beats illumos in performance." I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. "You can continue to use your Slowlaris based OS and live in the past. Your prerogative." It's neither slow, nor do I live in the past: illumos is being very actively developed and not only does it beat Linux in everything, it has more features. And yes it is my prerogative and I shall continue running it, because I like rock-solid, high performance systems that I can just deploy and leave running for years without having to tune or maintain. I love that. "AHAHAHA I got more performance from my junk server on Linux 10 years ago, easily beating Solaris, regularly peaking around 100 MB/s." Are you making a good faith argument here? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16382456 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16382456 Brendan has gone rogue after a fallout and is not to be trusted. He became a hostile witness the moment he abandoned the illumos movement and gave into trend-pandering because of what vast majority is running. Anyone pandering to trends has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. I don't care if it were Scott McNealy himself: you start advocating for a piece of shit technology like GNU, Linux, or GNU/Linux, I'm done with you. It's not up for discussion. "We had to get special switches specifically because Linux would over saturate way past 40 Gbps. Never had that issue with Slowlaris." Correct on both counts! What do you know? Yes you had to get special switches and equipment while I completely saturated an entire switch with a piece of junk DELL, and here comes the kicker: running Solaris 10 for i86pc... without any tuning whatsoever! Out of the box performance on a total piece of junk P. C. tin-bucket, DELL hardware. I think I shall stick with Solaris and SmartOS, thank-you-very-much! "Ah, so you'll stick with Linux!" I'd rather drop dead.

Tester0x1 7y ago
>I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. You always claim people are making "bad faith" arguments when you get called out and owned. It's a poor, thinly veiled response that everyone sees through. Annatard claiming "bad faith" translates to: "REEEE!!! I got owned, let me start foaming!" >It's neither slow Yes, it objectively and statistically is, as shown in pretty much any test/metric ever in the past decade or so. I even linked examples to which you have no retort. >nor do I live in the past: illumos is being very actively developed and not only does it beat Linux in everything, it has more features WRONG! It's nowhere near as actively developed as Linux (there are Linux sub-components that are more actively developed than illumos), and it can't beat Linux in anything, and has LESS features. illumos still doesn't have GPGPU support last I remember... nor does it have PCI passthrough in 2019... IOMMU? LOL! >Brendan has gone rogue after a fallout and is not to be trusted. He became a hostile witness the moment he abandoned the illumos movement and gave into trend-pandering because of what vast majority is running. Anyone pandering to trends has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. I don't care if it were Scott McNealy himself: you start advocating for a piece of shit technology like GNU, Linux, or GNU/Linux, I'm done with you. It's not up for discussion. Are you seeing your doctor about your delusions? You need to seek help. Gregg specifically outlined exactly why Linux has won, and again, aside from your delusional dribbling, you have no retort. >Correct on both counts! What do you know? Yes you had to get special switches and equipment while I completely saturated an entire switch with a piece of junk DELL, and here comes the kicker: running Solaris 10 for i86pc... without any tuning whatsoever! Is this even English? Pure nonsensical dribbling. You could never saturate an entire switch with illumos, even with tuning. Linux outperforms illumos/Solaris, and it has for years. >I'd rather drop dead. I can't imagine saying something this autistic in 2019.
Tester0x1 7y ago
>I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. You always claim people are making "bad faith" arguments when you get called out and owned. It's a poor, thinly veiled response that everyone sees through. Annatard claiming "bad faith" translates to: "REEEE!!! I got owned, let me start foaming!" >It's neither slow Yes, it objectively and statistically is, as shown in pretty much any test/metric ever in the past decade or so. I even linked examples to which you have no retort. >nor do I live in the past: illumos is being very actively developed and not only does it beat Linux in everything, it has more features WRONG! It's nowhere near as actively developed as Linux (there are Linux sub-components that are more actively developed than illumos), and it can't beat Linux in anything, and has LESS features. illumos still doesn't have GPGPU support last I remember... nor does it have PCI passthrough in 2019... IOMMU? LOL! >Brendan has gone rogue after a fallout and is not to be trusted. He became a hostile witness the moment he abandoned the illumos movement and gave into trend-pandering because of what vast majority is running. Anyone pandering to trends has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. I don't care if it were Scott McNealy himself: you start advocating for a piece of shit technology like GNU, Linux, or GNU/Linux, I'm done with you. It's not up for discussion. Are you seeing your doctor about your delusions? You need to seek help. Gregg specifically outlined exactly why Linux has won, and again, aside from your delusional dribbling, you have no retort. >Correct on both counts! What do you know? Yes you had to get special switches and equipment while I completely saturated an entire switch with a piece of junk DELL, and here comes the kicker: running Solaris 10 for i86pc... without any tuning whatsoever! Is this even English? Pure nonsensical dribbling. You can't saturate an entire switch with illumos, even with tuning. Linux outperforms illumos/Solaris, and it has for years. >I'd rather drop dead. I can't imagine saying something this inane in 2019.
Tester0x2 7y ago
>I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. You always claim people are making "bad faith" arguments when you get called out and owned. It's a poor, thinly veiled response that everyone sees through. Annatard claiming "bad faith" translates to: "REEEE!!! I got owned, let me start foaming!" >It's neither slow Yes, it objectively and statistically is, as shown in pretty much any test/metric ever in the past decade or so. I even linked examples to which you have no retort. >nor do I live in the past: illumos is being very actively developed and not only does it beat Linux in everything, it has more features WRONG! It's nowhere near as actively developed as Linux (there are Linux sub-components that are more actively developed than illumos), and it can't beat Linux in anything, and has LESS features. illumos still doesn't have GPGPU support last I remember... nor does it have PCI passthrough in 2019... IOMMU? LOL! >Brendan has gone rogue after a fallout and is not to be trusted. He became a hostile witness the moment he abandoned the illumos movement and gave into trend-pandering because of what vast majority is running. Anyone pandering to trends has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. I don't care if it were Scott McNealy himself: you start advocating for a piece of shit technology like GNU, Linux, or GNU/Linux, I'm done with you. It's not up for discussion. Are you seeing your doctor about your delusions? You need to seek help. Gregg specifically outlined exactly why Linux has won, and again, aside from your delusional dribbling, you have no retort. >Correct on both counts! What do you know? Yes you had to get special switches and equipment while I completely saturated an entire switch with a piece of junk DELL, and here comes the kicker: running Solaris 10 for i86pc... without any tuning whatsoever! Is this even English? Pure nonsensical dribbling. You could never saturate an entire switch with illumos, even with tuning. Linux outperforms illumos/Solaris, and it has for years. >I'd rather drop dead. I can't imagine saying something this inane in 2019.

Tester0x1 7y ago

>I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. You always claim people are making "bad faith" arguments when you get called out and owned. It's a poor, thinly veiled response that everyone sees through. Annatard claiming "bad faith" translates to: "REEEE!!! I got owned, let me start foaming!" >It's neither slow Yes, it objectively and statistically is, as shown in pretty much any test/metric ever in the past decade or so. I even linked examples to which you have no retort. >nor do I live in the past: illumos is being very actively developed and not only does it beat Linux in everything, it has more features WRONG! It's nowhere near as actively developed as Linux (there are Linux sub-components that are more actively developed than illumos), and it can't beat Linux in anything, and has LESS features. illumos still doesn't have GPGPU support last I remember... nor does it have PCI passthrough in 2019... IOMMU? LOL! >Brendan has gone rogue after a fallout and is not to be trusted. He became a hostile witness the moment he abandoned the illumos movement and gave into trend-pandering because of what vast majority is running. Anyone pandering to trends has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. I don't care if it were Scott McNealy himself: you start advocating for a piece of shit technology like GNU, Linux, or GNU/Linux, I'm done with you. It's not up for discussion. Are you seeing your doctor about your delusions? You need to seek help. Gregg specifically outlined exactly why Linux has won, and again, aside from your delusional dribbling, you have no retort. >Correct on both counts! What do you know? Yes you had to get special switches and equipment while I completely saturated an entire switch with a piece of junk DELL, and here comes the kicker: running Solaris 10 for i86pc... without any tuning whatsoever! Is this even English? Pure nonsensical dribbling. You could never saturate an entire switch with illumos, even with tuning. Linux outperforms illumos/Solaris, and it has for years. >I'd rather drop dead. I can't imagine saying something this autistic in 2019.

Tester0x1 7y ago

>I don't believe that you making an argument in good faith here. You always claim people are making "bad faith" arguments when you get called out and owned. It's a poor, thinly veiled response that everyone sees through. Annatard claiming "bad faith" translates to: "REEEE!!! I got owned, let me start foaming!" >It's neither slow Yes, it objectively and statistically is, as shown in pretty much any test/metric ever in the past decade or so. I even linked examples to which you have no retort. >nor do I live in the past: illumos is being very actively developed and not only does it beat Linux in everything, it has more features WRONG! It's nowhere near as actively developed as Linux (there are Linux sub-components that are more actively developed than illumos), and it can't beat Linux in anything, and has LESS features. illumos still doesn't have GPGPU support last I remember... nor does it have PCI passthrough in 2019... IOMMU? LOL! >Brendan has gone rogue after a fallout and is not to be trusted. He became a hostile witness the moment he abandoned the illumos movement and gave into trend-pandering because of what vast majority is running. Anyone pandering to trends has no credibility as far as I'm concerned. I don't care if it were Scott McNealy himself: you start advocating for a piece of shit technology like GNU, Linux, or GNU/Linux, I'm done with you. It's not up for discussion. Are you seeing your doctor about your delusions? You need to seek help. Gregg specifically outlined exactly why Linux has won, and again, aside from your delusional dribbling, you have no retort. >Correct on both counts! What do you know? Yes you had to get special switches and equipment while I completely saturated an entire switch with a piece of junk DELL, and here comes the kicker: running Solaris 10 for i86pc... without any tuning whatsoever! Is this even English? Pure nonsensical dribbling. You can't saturate an entire switch with illumos, even with tuning. Linux outperforms illumos/Solaris, and it has for years. >I'd rather drop dead. I can't imagine saying something this inane in 2019.

Tester0x2 7y ago