> Only a programmer would think this would not damage the success of the project. It's a Pascal compiler for Commodore 64. I don't think naming is the factor

> Only a programmer would think this would not damage the success of the project. It's a Pascal compiler for Commodore 64. I don't think naming is the factor that would inhibit the widespread use of this compiler. Not to mention, it's a good enough name: everyone's going to remember "Turbo Rascal", which conveys all the information necessary (like Turbo Pascal, but not really).