I hit the pay wall, but the introduction of it has two unfounded premises: - Eating meat is bad for the planet - Eating meat has a direct causation of negativ

I hit the pay wall, but the introduction of it has two unfounded premises: - Eating meat is bad for the planet - Eating meat has a direct causation of negative health outcomes If China were too gluttonous on meat for current supply, then wouldn't that just cause prices to go up, and supply to go up too? Perhaps government central planners and those who support them at the Economist need to learn basic micro-economics.