3 ms·
> It's still very OOP, but not in the sense of representing real-world taxonomies. 1. OOP was never about "representing real-world taxonomies." 2. Real-world
by morelisp 7y ago
> It's still very OOP, but not in the sense of representing real-world taxonomies.
1. OOP was never about "representing real-world taxonomies."
2. Real-world taxonomies are often not very good at representing real-word taxonomies.
Programmers are highly susceptible to scientism, and it's ruined whatever chance OOP had of being a tool rather than an ideology.