3 ms·
And apparently you see no reason to cite "everyone else's", even when that would have strengthened the persuasiveness of your argument. Hm.
by timmytokyo 7y ago
And apparently you see no reason to cite "everyone else's", even when that would have strengthened the persuasiveness of your argument. Hm.
- xyzzyz 7y agohttps://psycnet.apa.org/record/1976-08398-001 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1976-08398-001 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.1998.11775147?journalCode=uhej20 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221546.1998.11... (this one summarizes something like 20 other studies in a nice table) https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15326977EA0801_01 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15326977EA0801_... https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/07399863930153004 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/073998639301530... https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001316447903900220 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/001316447903900... https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-09427-001 https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1968-09427-001 You want more? I could give you probably 50 more studies. The literature here is vast and consistent.