2 ms·
> The argument is that one world (dynamism) allows for higher throughput than a static-checked environment. I have programmed in both dynamic languages and typ
by mbrodersen 7y ago
> The argument is that one world (dynamism) allows for higher throughput than a static-checked environment.
I have programmed in both dynamic languages and typed languages for 35+ years. And I am most definitely more productive using a typed language. Otherwise I wouldn't. So I wonder why our experiences are so different?