3 ms·
"wherein, fundamentally, lies the difference?" I don't want to mess with Google's or Facebook's or Apple's code. I want to publish stuff without having to pay
by Tichy 16y ago
"wherein, fundamentally, lies the difference?"
I don't want to mess with Google's or Facebook's or Apple's code. I want to publish stuff without having to pay a fee to Apple.
Granted, maybe there will always be the Internet, so we have nothing to worry about.
In essence, Apple would end up being more like TV, only with more channels.
I don't like Google or Facebook becoming monopolies, either.
- madaxe 16y agoIf apple does end up having that variety of completely push model, they will end up alienating their most evangelical userbase - something they may potentially not particularly care about by the point at which they'd make a decision of that ilk - however, if they do, said evangelists will jump ship, fast, and the next iteration of creation and growth will start once more. Monopolies only exist when they're protected by law - take, for instance, Fannie Mae and friends - in a capitalist society, however, in the absence of such foul concepts as lobbying, monopolies don't exist, and can't, as typical monopolistic behaviour is ultimately self-destructive, as it merely encourages consumers to seek alternate service or product providers. In terms of having to pay a fee to apple - they provide the platform, they provide the consumers, they provide the tools - and for that, you pay a fee. The alternative is self-publishing, which is, and always will be, possible, but it doesn't come with a built-in consumer base, and therein lies the rub.
- Tichy 16y agoSelf publishing for Apple iOS devices is not possible. As I said in another comment, I have nothing against app stores.