3 ms·
Sorry, I didn’t mean to suggest that you had taken this position. I just really want to move the conversation forward. So there are problems with Medicare, but
by TaylorAlexander 7y ago
Sorry, I didn’t mean to suggest that you had taken this position. I just really want to move the conversation forward. So there are problems with Medicare, but you seem to know about this so I’m curious what you would suggest we do to provide coverage to millions of poor Americans currently going without. I’m no policy expert and I thought M4A is a great idea. Thanks!
- tptacek 7y agoI don't know. What I'm advocating is that any discussion of the US health care problem start with a breakdown of where the money is going in our system. There are competing breakdowns, but any of them would be better than the default presumption we seem to have that the problem with health care is "insurance companies and prescription drugs". No breakdown I've seen on any side of this debate shows that either of those things are the true driver of costs in our system. I'm not defending either the current private health insurance system, which I think needs drastic reform, or the market for prescription drugs, which is dysfunctional in a bunch of ways. But I am unconvinced that the public intuition about the overall health care problem is well informed.
- TaylorAlexander 7y agoAh I see. Thanks for sharing that. It’s all so vague to me. There’s so many different analyses and so many experts who will attest to competing facts. My priorities are just: 1) Ensure universal coverage for all Americans. 2) Structure it so costs are at least as reasonable as those in other countries with similar systems. So for me, universal coverage immediately is a hard requirement and of course it must be done as fiscally responsible as we can manage. But we can always refine the system to lower cost later. We can’t replace the lives lost due to inadequate coverage.