3 ms·

That's fine - most of the time we discover information through 3rd party not the origin. But HN guideline[1] suggests that please submit original source.

by devy 7y ago

That's fine - most of the time we discover information through 3rd party not the origin. But HN guideline[1] suggests that please submit original source. Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter. Also, reposting the same news again after a week doesn't bring other people who saw it any more use and may divert conversations in different threads. Occasionally the mods allow news of great importance to be reposted but I think this is probably not the case here, IMO. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

slowhand09 7y ago
Posting it if you didn't see it the 1st time is reposting to you, but not to me or others who missed it the 1st time (or 4th time) around. Diverting conversations... really?
- dang 7y ago
  There are different ways of looking at this, of course, but HN's rules are clear: (1) please post the original (as devy quoted above), and (2) a post is a dupe if the story has had significant attention in the last year or so (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html). These rules maximize the overall quality of the site. It's certainly true that not everybody sees every post; but if we went with that logic, there would be no such thing as a duplicate at all. That would be bad. Front page space is the scarcest resource on HN, and needs to be distributed across as many high-quality stories as possible. A great tool for running across interesting stories that you didn't see on HN the first time round is the 'past' link in the top bar, which lets you browse HN's top stories day by day.
40four 7y ago
Agreed. Usually a good idea to do a quick search to make sure what you're about to post doesn't already have a thread, especially one that gained traction. That being said, I missed the trending last week, so I was happy to see it :)

by devy 7y ago

slowhand09 7y ago

Posting it if you didn't see it the 1st time is reposting to you, but not to me or others who missed it the 1st time (or 4th time) around. Diverting conversations... really?

dang 7y ago
There are different ways of looking at this, of course, but HN's rules are clear: (1) please post the original (as devy quoted above), and (2) a post is a dupe if the story has had significant attention in the last year or so (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsfaq.html). These rules maximize the overall quality of the site. It's certainly true that not everybody sees every post; but if we went with that logic, there would be no such thing as a duplicate at all. That would be bad. Front page space is the scarcest resource on HN, and needs to be distributed across as many high-quality stories as possible. A great tool for running across interesting stories that you didn't see on HN the first time round is the 'past' link in the top bar, which lets you browse HN's top stories day by day.

40four 7y ago

Agreed. Usually a good idea to do a quick search to make sure what you're about to post doesn't already have a thread, especially one that gained traction. That being said, I missed the trending last week, so I was happy to see it :)