3 ms·
I'm not meaning to be obtuse and I've only experienced a few earthquakes first-hand, but why would you need a near real-time notification? It's kind of obvious
by cookie_monsta 7y ago
I'm not meaning to be obtuse and I've only experienced a few earthquakes first-hand, but why would you need a near real-time notification? It's kind of obvious when one is happening in your vicinity and if it's not nearby why would the delay matter?
- mehrdadn 7y agoOne reason is that I've noticed sometimes it takes me a few seconds to be able to tell if it's genuinely an earthquake or if something else is causing a vibration, and sometimes it actually takes a few seconds for it to become noticeable... then a few seconds on top of that for me to figure out how to react. Any kind of confirmation notification at that point would be extremely helpful to snap me into action and avoid needless delays. Another reason is that, well, I might be asleep, and ideally I'd prefer to wake up with a notification, rather than (say) with something falling on my head...
- thinkingemote 7y ago1) Tsunami early warning system. The difference of 30 seconds might be enough to save a life. 5-10 minutes might save many more? 2) Stabilize machinery, close windows, blinds, turn off gas, start emergency generator in hospital. I'm sure the financial people would be able to sell stocks with earlier notice than others!
- kalleboo 7y agoThe real-time notifications to cell phones in Japan are faster than the actual seismic waves, so if it's a decently sized earthquake a little ways away, it gives you a 5-15 second head start
- m4rtink 7y agoShinkansens apply full breaks automatically if dangerous earthquake is detected (there are about 50 on the way just between Osaka and Tokyo). Thanks to this system many trainsets will already be stationary when the seismic waves hit them.