3 ms·
Here is a company that wants to get some work done by the masses. The points system is to incentivize users, however there are administrative tasks that need to
by zaphirplane 7y ago
Here is a company that wants to get some work done by the masses. The points system is to incentivize users, however there are administrative tasks that need to be done and mediation on conflict prone topics which can’t attract points for obvious reasons and they choose a vetted moderator model. so they anoint some trusted people as moderators
Over time the moderators forget that are spending their free time working for a company in exchange for some virtual badge or title and start thinking they are responsible for a community and feel ownership
Then they take a strong stance with company and are shocked to loose the virtual badges and titles
Here is the thing when you are a part of a community and take a strong stance they may disagree sideline you or kick you out no surprise here and that goes 100x when it’s a company
If you are working for a company in exchange for virtual badges, you are working for a company in exchange for virtual badges you are not the Shepard owner of the community
And lastly on my rant when I hear “we the stack over flow moderators” i picture a wide group of people some helpful some selfless some looking to be part of a community some thinking they own the community ...
- MauranKilom 7y ago> Then they take a strong stance with company and are shocked to loose the virtual badges and titles What are you describing here? There is exactly one moderator who was let go involuntarily, and she did not take any stance against the company whatsoever. I do not get the impression that you have a clear picture of what's going on. > spending their free time working for a company in exchange for some virtual badge Most of the activities you perform as a moderator do not grant badges (even if they would for "normal" users). In fact, said dismissed moderator only noticed her dismissal when she suddenly received badges for her everyday moderation work. > thinking they are responsible for a community and feel ownership There is no ownership over any community. That's just the wrong word. But the moderators are the part of the community that is closest to the company. If the company ignores the moderators, it ignores the community at large.