4 ms·
I guess a failure to do backups of any kind is beyond any solution we could offer, but if one could take even a single step forward beyond nothing, a read-only
by rsync 7y ago
I guess a failure to do backups of any kind is beyond any solution we could offer, but if one could take even a single step forward beyond nothing, a read-only (immutable) offsite destination is well worth your consideration.[1]
Most end users looking for "ransomware protection" probably just want to drag and drop some files, like Dropbox, which is why a simple SFTP (filezilla) solution is nice, but of course you could point any old thing[2] if you were more sophisticated ...
[1] https://www.rsync.net/products/ransomware.html https://www.rsync.net/products/ransomware.html
[2] borg, restic, rclone, git-annex ... rsync ...
- korzun 7y agoI subscribed to your service a couple of years back, and you were leaking other customers' home directories. The whole thing was just a shared, dedicated server with shell access. Super sketchy. Back then, you also stated that you offer super-secure access and all of that jazz. Funny that you are double downing on all the compliance bullshit and ransomware buzz words now. The compliance statements are pretty questionable and make no sense for the services you are offering. Surprised you don't provide 'military-grade' encryption. Just throw all of that in there keep the thing. Buyers beware. Do your homework.
- vultour 7y agoSurprised someone would use or recommend FileZilla after their numerous adware issues.
- rsync 7y agoI'm just thinking of simple SFTP clients ... WinSCP ? psftp.exe ? Whatever works for you.