> it's not that bluetooth as a protocol is inherently insecure Bluetooth is a ridiculously complex protocol. Complexity is the enemy of security. There's no fi

> it's not that bluetooth as a protocol is inherently insecure Bluetooth is a ridiculously complex protocol. Complexity is the enemy of security. There's no fixed threshold beyond which complexity makes something "insecure", and Wi-Fi and even USB aren't exactly simple (both have had their share of implementation exploits across operating systems), but AFAIU there's a strong sentiment that Bluetooth is far too complex for the benefit it brings, which perhaps explains why OpenBSD's stack was unmaintained.