5 ms·
I'm trying http://fuelphp.com/ http://fuelphp.com/ these days, also new, from ex-codeigniter, ex-kohana dudes. In other words, they've learnt some lessons from
by petervandijck 16y ago
I'm trying http://fuelphp.com/ http://fuelphp.com/ these days, also new, from ex-codeigniter, ex-kohana dudes. In other words, they've learnt some lessons from the other ones. Not bad so far.
- noodle 16y agoit looks good. have any other specific thoughts on it? strengths/weaknesses?
- petervandijck 16y agoWell, it seems basically pretty codeigniter-like, but much improved, dropping legacy stuff. The docs still need work (they don't even mention the form lib for example), I might help out with that. I hope they take it to a stable and well documented 1.0 (they're in beta now).
- noodle 16y agothink the CI community branch will detract any from this project?
- petervandijck 16y agoNo, in fact, some of the same people are involved. The CI community thing will still be CI. This is fresh, from the ground up.
- noodle 16y agoi know, and that is what i meant, actually. looks like a good bit of crossover, and if they're going to work on CI community, too, that probably means less work on fuel. and who knows, maybe there's some sort of contractual obligations in there, as well.
- keso 16y agoI don't like how they use static methods for almost everything.
- rickmb 16y agoThanks for the heads up, now I know I don't even have to bother checking it out...
- smoody 16y agoWhat's the downside with static methods? It makes sense to me that they use them for factories and now that the can be effectively overridden in PHP5.3, I'm not sure why it's a bad thing... perhaps just a personal preference?
- simonhamp 16y agoI'm going to be giving that a go too at some point. Probably just for benchmarking though ;)