Why only 500? Why not 5000? Or even 50,000 accelerators? After all, as the author simply claims that, "it depends" if 500 accelerators can actually succeed. A

Why only 500? Why not 5000? Or even 50,000 accelerators? After all, as the author simply claims that, "it depends" if 500 accelerators can actually succeed. And if we are going bet, let's bet high. No point playing Roulette and betting on black or red. Let's go with the double 0s. So, I propose that "America" launches 500,000 accelerators. (Each unemployed person in the city of Los Angeles can be made a CEO.) Since, "it depends".