4 ms·

The main issue is that someone can hijack your phone, use the compromising screen protector and get in to your device Edit: Here is a video demonstration, post

The main issue is that someone can hijack your phone, use the compromising screen protector and get in to your device Edit: Here is a video demonstration, posted by someone else in this discussion https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688 https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688

johntb86 7y ago
That assumes that it'll recognize any of the original fingerprints after you put on the screen protector. It may just see one big blob though the screen protector. You'd have to take the phone, put a screen protector on, give it back, have them retrain the detection, then steal it again and finally unlock it.
- michannne 7y ago
  From the korean video someone posted in this discussion, it seems you can use any fingerprint just by putting on a screen protector - no retraining necessary
thefreeman 7y ago
I don't think that is accurate. I believe the issue is that adding your fingerprint with the screen protector on essentially makes it so anyone can unlock it. If you add your fingerprint without the screen protector, putting the screen protector on and scanning a fingerprint will not get you in.
- michannne 7y ago
  That does not seem to be the case here: https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688 https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688
nolok 7y ago
From what I understand it's not that, it's fingerprint recorded as authorized while the flawed protection is on, that won't work. If you record a new fingerprint without any protection, or one that doesn't confuse the sensor, you can't then put the flawed protection on top and have it bypass security.
- didibus 7y ago
  I thought that, but if you look at the video linked, you can clearly see they register their fingerprint pre-screen protector. And then by putting the screen protector on, they can now unlock it with any finger. I'm quite baffled by it honestly.
  - penagwin 7y ago
    Jezz. _that_ is bad. How is that even possible? I mean it makes sense if you trained it with your finger with the faulty protector, but adding a faulty protector makes it work? Surely the sensor must be able to tell the difference (even if it's currently doing it incorrectly)
    - sundvor 7y ago
      Yep I saw the video after my post above also, and it didn't make any sense to me either. Couldn't tell whether the N10 was completely naked during scan due to the quality of the video. Would like to see verification, and to learn if the S105G sensor would be affected as well. It operates a bit better than the S10+, so it may not be identical - although that might be position only.
  - Izkata 7y ago
    But, they have to adjust the screen protector's position before the wrong finger registers. That video makes it look like the protector was contaminated with a fingerprint before the recording began.

johntb86 7y ago

That assumes that it'll recognize any of the original fingerprints after you put on the screen protector. It may just see one big blob though the screen protector. You'd have to take the phone, put a screen protector on, give it back, have them retrain the detection, then steal it again and finally unlock it.

michannne 7y ago
From the korean video someone posted in this discussion, it seems you can use any fingerprint just by putting on a screen protector - no retraining necessary

thefreeman 7y ago

I don't think that is accurate. I believe the issue is that adding your fingerprint with the screen protector on essentially makes it so anyone can unlock it. If you add your fingerprint without the screen protector, putting the screen protector on and scanning a fingerprint will not get you in.

michannne 7y ago
That does not seem to be the case here: https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688 https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688

nolok 7y ago

From what I understand it's not that, it's fingerprint recorded as authorized while the flawed protection is on, that won't work. If you record a new fingerprint without any protection, or one that doesn't confuse the sensor, you can't then put the flawed protection on top and have it bypass security.

didibus 7y ago
I thought that, but if you look at the video linked, you can clearly see they register their fingerprint pre-screen protector. And then by putting the screen protector on, they can now unlock it with any finger. I'm quite baffled by it honestly.
- penagwin 7y ago
  Jezz. _that_ is bad. How is that even possible? I mean it makes sense if you trained it with your finger with the faulty protector, but adding a faulty protector makes it work? Surely the sensor must be able to tell the difference (even if it's currently doing it incorrectly)
  - sundvor 7y ago
    Yep I saw the video after my post above also, and it didn't make any sense to me either. Couldn't tell whether the N10 was completely naked during scan due to the quality of the video. Would like to see verification, and to learn if the S105G sensor would be affected as well. It operates a bit better than the S10+, so it may not be identical - although that might be position only.
- Izkata 7y ago
  But, they have to adjust the screen protector's position before the wrong finger registers. That video makes it look like the protector was contaminated with a fingerprint before the recording began.