This article is not necessarily convincing; however, the fact that we currently have an administration in power where it is potentially believable is disappoint

This article is not necessarily convincing; however, the fact that we currently have an administration in power where it is potentially believable is disappointing. The president is actively profiting off of foreign powers and lobbyists booking rooms in his hotels to curry favor and with holding foreign aid to force investigations into his political enemies. His daughter is serving on his administration and actively receiving patents from the Chinese. His son in law is serving in the administration and actively seeking (receiving?) investments from the Saudi's in order to fund his business. The presidents sons are actively seeking investments from foreign governments for their fathers business. Whatever your thoughts on Carter he put his peanut farm in a trust to avoid any semblance of impropriety. Would anyone be shocked if the article was correct in what it implies? That is the truly upsetting aspect of our political reality not whether or not the president is responsible for this particular implied malfeasance.