4 ms·
https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/17/samsung-patch-fingerprint-reader/?guccounter=1#comments https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/17/samsung-patch-fingerprin... Wha
by fl0wenol 7y ago
https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/17/samsung-patch-fingerprint-reader/?guccounter=1#comments https://www.engadget.com/2019/10/17/samsung-patch-fingerprin...
What is suspected here is that registering the finger with the screen protector on is masking the shape of the finger while still registering the touch action. As a result, it's enrolling a blank print. Then anyone else can unlock it afterwards with the screen protector still on.
Consider that screen protectors are designed and tested only to make sure touch actions work correctly, but this ultrasonic fingerprint ridge-shape detection technology is new, so they're probably not mutually compatible.
I don't know what was wrong with the swipe sensor. They're discreet, easy to keep clean, and hard to screw up. Maybe the only downside is they would keep them too close to the camera lens for accidentally lens smudging.
- ahbyb 7y agoAh, what I understood from tfa is that you could take any mobile phone with a properly registered fingerprint (ie without having used a screen protector) and then unlock it by placing a screen protector between the fingerprint reader and any fingerprint.
- Daniel_sk 7y agoThe fingerprint is registered without the screen protector on - proof: https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688 https://twitter.com/Sta_Light_/status/1184475413252210688