41 ms·
If you want something reasonably simple and fast to compute but which has been optimized to fit available experimental data better than CIELAB you could try htt
by jacobolus 7y ago
If you want something reasonably simple and fast to compute but which has been optimized to fit available experimental data better than CIELAB you could try https://observablehq.com/@jrus/jzazbz https://observablehq.com/@jrus/jzazbz
- notzuck 7y agoYou're not smart.
- jacobolus 7y agoWhat?
- notzuck 7y agoExactly what I said. You're just not smart. You're not really worth my time and I have nothing but contempt for the way you think.
- jacobolus 7y agoWhy do you feel the need to express this sentiment in a completely unrelated public discussion? (Are you an expert on human color vision or color reproduction technology or something?) Why should anyone reading this care whether you think I’m smart or not? Why should I care? I guess I should feel flattered to have earned your contempt. (Is your contempt a rare prize? Or do you feel contempt easily?) Sorry for all the questions, but this is a quite strange and amusing experience for me.
- dang 7y agoYikes. Posting like you did in this thread is a bannable offence on HN. I'm going to assume you didn't know you were breaking the site guidelines, but would you mind reviewing them and taking the spirit of this site to heart? Note the most important rule for comments: "Be kind." It doesn't vary based on how wrong (or how smart) the other person is. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html