3 ms·
And the “but for” argument should have clearly applied here. They would not be denied a cake but for the gender (protected class) of who they were marrying. Thi
by inlined 7y ago
And the “but for” argument should have clearly applied here. They would not be denied a cake but for the gender (protected class) of who they were marrying. This was a clear case of judicial reinterpretation to meet an agenda.
- greglindahl 7y agoDoesn't Colorado explicitly ban discrimination against gay people?