I don't see how he arrives at the conclusion there would be less pollution. Compared to when? What exactly would he define as such? I could counter all the stu

I don't see how he arrives at the conclusion there would be less pollution. Compared to when? What exactly would he define as such? I could counter all the stuff he proposes now with bringing in more of the bad news but I've already done that in another answer if you are interested. He can be optimistic as he is a white male with prosperity. This group is the one with the best conditions on earth - it's easy to enjoy life if you can be a part of that. The people who suffer the most don't even have the luxury to think about global concerns and inequality. They have to fight to survive every day and they have to feed their families and escape the next war to finally arrive in the West where he will be treated worse than a dog. Please ask these people how they cannot share his positive view on our planet.