3 ms·
That's a great way to lose advertisers. Case in point: Youtube's demonetization policy.
by johnzhou 7y ago
That's a great way to lose advertisers. Case in point: Youtube's demonetization policy.
- drak0n1c 7y agoAdvertisers didn't care for over a decade until partisan agitators such as Media Matters and Vox methodically cherry picked screenshots of brands next to maligned youtube channels, and then contacted brands threatening to publish names and shame if they didn't pull their advertising. The result of this short-sighted crusade was Youtube becoming unprofitable for millions of small creators around the world, and people of all sides of politics suffering including non-political LGBT creators.
- lackbeard 7y agoThis is the first I’ve heard this hypothesis. Do you have links to any data?
- hnuser54 7y agoAny particular advertiser needs Youtube more than Youtube needs the advertiser. Youtube has a critical hold on the young adult market in particular. If Youtube just said, "if you don't like it, Pepsi, someone else can enjoy this ad space instead", what recourse would they have? In conclusion Youtube demonetizes because they want to and need an excuse.
- cameronbrown 7y agoIf you look at the data, the "adpocalypse" cost alphabet over 70 billion dollars on their market cap.
- flukus 7y agoIt's also a great way to whitewash history. Want to educate the next generation about Hitlers atrocities? No money for you. Basically anything war seems to be getting demonetized these days. Advertisers only want to appear next to cats on roombas.
- o-__-o 7y agoI B M