2 ms·
This article seems to be laced with innappropriate bias. It appears to be judging gitlab for this decision. Beyond that, its weird that this is not only an unc
by justinmchase 7y ago
This article seems to be laced with innappropriate bias. It appears to be judging gitlab for this decision.
Beyond that, its weird that this is not only an uncontroversial position to take but anything other than the only legal option. The government should be the only arbiter of morality with regards to business, where judging your business or actions to be illegal and/or issuing a court order to a company to stop service or remove content should be the _only_ legal way a company can refuse you service.
I do not think putting these kinds of decisions into the hands of unelected people or companies is a good idea.
- Kaveren 7y agoHypothetically, why is it so unreasonable that you would ban someone who advocated for genocide from participating on your platform? The government is not supposed to legislate all morality. There's plenty of awful things you can do that are perfectly legal. Companies can and should be able to choose who they do business with.