> I'm assuming you mean The United States, but a 'Cherokee nation' exists/existed too. So I actually mean the Cherokee nation. Their platform of excluding non-

> I'm assuming you mean The United States, but a 'Cherokee nation' exists/existed too. So I actually mean the Cherokee nation. Their platform of excluding non-Cherokee from the nation is akin to the white supremacists of America not wanting non-whites to live in America. If the nation ends up getting its freedom (as I think they should), that sovereign state ought to be accepting of migrants, as the current government of the United States ought to be as well. > Leave for where, also Re: my paragraph above, didn't the sea-bound settlers arrive and take over the park they were living in? As espoused elsewhere, I am proposing that the currently defined indian reservations (with their boundaries set by treaty with the United States) be given the opportunity to leave the Union, and form independent sovereign states. I am not asking anyone to physically 'move', by ship, or car, or plane. I am referring to a figurative leaving -- letting the land leave the sovereignty of the United States and its member states.