3 ms·
>All I know is it has something to do with Monica questioning some new CoC changes (pronoun-related) and then being fired for "violating" the CoC before it was
by forgottenpass 7y ago
>All I know is it has something to do with Monica questioning some new CoC changes (pronoun-related) and then being fired for "violating" the CoC before it was even ratified.
Pretty close. Monica blogged a timeline if you want even more reading. https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2019/10/05/stack-overflow-fiasco-timeline.html https://cellio.dreamwidth.org/2019/10/05/stack-overflow-fias... And then these might be better entrypoints to what followed https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/334248/an-update-to-our-community-and-an-apology https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/334248/an-update-to... https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-and-forced-relicensing-is-stack-exchange-still-interested-in-cooper https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/333965/firing-mods-...
>It's very unclear to me what everyone's positions on this issue
Most people seem to care more about how StackExchange handled it and what it means for the future of contributing to SE sites. The way SE got rid of her, and the subsequent damage control has been a dumpster fire.
They're prepping to sell the company, and the shit communication skills are probably a deliberate not-so-subtle "fuck off" to any volunteers that have become more ingrained into the community than the free frontline staff SE wants.
- joshstrange 7y agoThank you, that timeline was VERY helpful and I think now have a better grasp. It makes sense why I was so confused as a number of the actors (SE-staff mainly) in this acted in a way that defies logic (for me).
- m-p-3 7y agoThat's frustrating to see how they treat their volunteers, which are IMO the lifeblood of SE. If they go away, SE is nothing else than an archive of Q&A, which will crumble away over time.