2 ms·
> This solution addresses people in the UK visiting UK sites. If you want to prevent your citizens from going to a site hosted elsewhere, then you would have to
by schoen 7y ago
> This solution addresses people in the UK visiting UK sites. If you want to prevent your citizens from going to a site hosted elsewhere, then you would have to consume the RTA auditing results and enforce them at your internet border.
But isn't that already the structure of what the old proposal was going to do? UK ISPs would be expected to actively cooperate in blocking things indicated to them, most of which would be hosted outside of the country.
- LinuxBender 7y agoThe primary difference being, end users are not registering with a centralized site and handing over sensitive information. There would be no citizen database. Rather, the inverse would be true. A database of adult sites that lack a header. Don't get me wrong, I think a citizen database of porn passes would be a blast, once it leaks out from some public S3 bucket. I would tease Ricky Gervais about his habits until he turns it into a standup routine. (kidding, but it could happen) I'm just hoping one of his writers visits this site.
- schoen 7y agoOh, sorry, I got confused about which part of the plan you were focusing on. I thought you were focused on the blocking method rather than on the opt-out method, and I didn't see any significant impact on the blocking method. What you've said makes better sense to me now.