> Why is CNN even remotely relevant? > That CNN is part of the propaganda machine is doubtless. So being "part of the propaganda machine" isn't enough to qual

> Why is CNN even remotely relevant? > That CNN is part of the propaganda machine is doubtless. So being "part of the propaganda machine" isn't enough to qualify as "even remotely relevant"? :/ If you value consistency and intellectual honesty you might want to backtrack on one of these claims or at least admit that your statements are obviously incompatible without further qualification. "Even remotely" isn't a very high bar to meet.