3 ms·
In every country the ruling party does not understand technology. It's very difficult to regulate something you don't understand. The back door encryption thin
by gravypod 7y ago
In every country the ruling party does not understand technology. It's very difficult to regulate something you don't understand.
The back door encryption thing is a fun example of this.
- lm28469 7y agoYes, and this is the real issue to me. The end user having a computer science PhD or not won't change that.
- Santosh83 7y agoHow is that? If more 'ordinary' people understood that the only functional encryption is one that is resistant to MitM etc., and the undesirability of implementing backdoors, even for ostensibly legitimate reasons, there would be far more pressure on legislators to not keep advancing these proposals than there is now.
- lm28469 7y agoAgain, knowing that privacy is good doesn't have anything to do with the "underlying tech" and doesn't require any technological understanding. You can read a book without knowing how it was printed.