Both points - that Chomsky has not received the Nobel price due to 'bias' and that the Nobel Price for economics is a neoliberal 'plot' are essentially false an

Both points - that Chomsky has not received the Nobel price due to 'bias' and that the Nobel Price for economics is a neoliberal 'plot' are essentially false and conspiratorial. I like Chomsky because he's such an antagonist (we need them) but I think he also misrepresents a lot of information.