Article begins with stating it is bad to have white christian males in a group and the article concludes in the end it is better to have immigrants. Of course i

Article begins with stating it is bad to have white christian males in a group and the article concludes in the end it is better to have immigrants. Of course it is a praise to migration. Don't be naive. And your comparison doesn't even make sense, I'm not commenting on every article at the Economist, just this one.