> I don't see an inherent reason why the middle ground is correct when assessing blame. Either one or the other party receives all the blame, or you are in the

> I don't see an inherent reason why the middle ground is correct when assessing blame. Either one or the other party receives all the blame, or you are in the middle ground of spreading the blame around. One group is entirely responsible IFF the other entirely _not_ responsible. Anecdotally, it does not seem like either party bears zero responsibility, so neither party bears all responsibility, which seems to me to be a nearly-inherent reason why the middle ground is correct. > I should use something to block certain sites. But just because I have that responsibility doesn't diminish someone else's culpability for inflicting harms. Very well put!