I think you make an interesting argument. How do you feel about the limitations of Twitter affecting someone's ability to speak? The character limit or the lay

I think you make an interesting argument. How do you feel about the limitations of Twitter affecting someone's ability to speak? The character limit or the layout or any other reality of the platform design. I haven't really ever used Twitter. I sometimes end up on a developer or product page in doing some web surfing, but I can't think of any information I was able to retrieve through another medium that I would rather have received on Twitter. For example, some top search results for a developer was a tweet of benchmarks. I read the tweet and then made my way to his site and to a conference video on the subject. I wish his site had been my top search result. Maybe Twitter is a good forum for "subscribing to notifications" and using it to broadcast external links along with word-bites is a good use of the platform? I'm interested in how you or anyone think about this, especially about the idea of "translation" and "protection" that various media stamp on issues. I'm further interested in "live news" and I hold the opinion that live news isn't necessary to me or to be even available to anyone. I'd rather have a transparent recording and processing pipeline that delivers to me newsworthy stories(I can't read everything), but that I could also inspect to see how editorial decisions could have omitted or changed meaning (looking at compiled source material through a search medium designed for that task).