18 ms·
Fair enough, we could restate it, then: it would be generally unobjectionable to create and enforce a rule against disrupting tournament coverage with political
by cjbprime 7y ago
Fair enough, we could restate it, then: it would be generally unobjectionable to create and enforce a rule against disrupting tournament coverage with political speech.
- Fnoord 7y agoAll speech is related to politics though. There is no such thing as "apolitical speech". As for the survey, it shows also something else: company loyalty. Also, they called it Activision Blizzard; not Blizzard. So they included Activision employees in the survey?