3 ms·
Study from 2009. I wonder why I haven't heard much about this.
by rfugger 16y ago
Study from 2009. I wonder why I haven't heard much about this.
- pyre 16y agoEither because it was debunked or because corn farmers have a large lobby/subsidies/etc. Take your pick, though the first theory is probably easier to prove that the second one.
- luu 16y agoYou can see studies which cite that study (which would include debunkings) by doing a google scholar search: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3661119272352849363&as_sdt=5,44&sciodt=0,44&hl=en http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=3661119272352849363&... One of the those studies has this to say about the study linked by the OP: "Weaknesses in the statistical methods used for reanalysis (see Doull et al. . .) " [1]. That paper also has a nice summary of other studies on GM foods. [1] G. Flachowsky and C. Wenk, The role of animal feeding trials for the nutritionaland safety assessment of feeds from genetically modified plants – Present stage and future challenges, Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 19, 2010, 149–170
- 16s 16y agoCorn farmers have children and eat corn too.
- silentbicycle 16y agoEither funding for repeat studies have been choked, or they had unsurprising results. At least they gave passably good instructions to duplicate their findings - beats many CS papers. Regardless of what it says, my experience is that GE corn tastes bland. Maybe due to shipping.