4 ms·
> Personally, I'd rather hear directly from the person, rather than get someone's spin on it. Well, that's ridiculously easy on Twitter. Just follow them. Wha
by braythwayt 7y ago
> Personally, I'd rather hear directly from the person, rather than get someone's spin on it.
Well, that's ridiculously easy on Twitter. Just follow them.
What is changing here is whether you hear from them just because your buddy Ed(wina) thinks they said something amazing, when they have a track record for breaking the Twitter rules.
IME, keeping on Twitter's good side is a pretty low bar is you're powerful and well-connected, so you will still hear plenty from the usual suspects.
> I've seen their fact checking, it's hilariously biased.
Twitter recently published their rules for fact-checking, and it involves relying on a very small set of third-party fact-checking organizations.
Look it up for yourself.
- s_y_n_t_a_x 7y ago> Well, that's ridiculously easy on Twitter. Just follow them. I was responding to the GP "We have no obligation to allow them to use social networks for propaganda purposes." > Twitter recently published their rules for fact-checking Didn't find anything, care to link it? I hope it's not PolitiFact