It's very elegant implementation, I wonder though if it's accurate to call it "uncensorable" when there's a single point of failure? Given that searching or sei

It's very elegant implementation, I wonder though if it's accurate to call it "uncensorable" when there's a single point of failure? Given that searching or seizing the machine hosting the site is still possible (even if that's just by coincidence)? Obviously for the side of the aisle here who are thinking of criminal uses, that's a feature not a bug, but for a dissident who is disappeared that looks different...