I agree. People have shown that the content that gets watch time and appeals to the widest demographic is "low quality". The author of this appears to have all

I agree. People have shown that the content that gets watch time and appeals to the widest demographic is "low quality". The author of this appears to have allowed their child to freely browse the collection of videos, regrets it, and is now passing blame. In the case of his father, the author is blaming YouTube for not curating proper content. Why didn't the author curate content for his father or spend more time with them to see what they were watching? It sounds like the premise of these points is that the author didn't appreciate the bubbles their family members fell into, and instead wanted them to be in different bubbles.