4 ms·
It's not relevant to the HN guidelines and so most people will flag it: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidel
by Erwin 7y ago
It's not relevant to the HN guidelines and so most people will flag it: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Is it interesting that some news org is passing stock footage? Is that in any way new? Maybe if they were using "deepfakes" to generate fake news videos it would be interesting, but it's not like the Turkish attack is in any way disputed.
Is reddit a good "detective"? Well,: https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-did-it-reddit https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/we-did-it-reddit
- catalogia 7y ago> "Is reddit a good "detective"?" How is that relevant to this discussion? That reddit is correct in this particular instance isn't in question. Unless you're entertaining the notion of devious redditors hacking youtube to fabricate the original video.. Responding to this circumstance by calling into question the reputation of reddit seems like textbook FUD. There is no legitimate defensible uncertainty or doubt here, no matter reddit's reputation.
- nyczomg 7y agoThose guidelines are fairly subjective when it comes to something like this. They don't say "most stories about politics..." rather than "all stories about politics..." for a reason. I think you could effectively argue either that this is on-topic or off-topic... That said, then why not err on the side of leaving this up? I like HN because there are usually insightful, level-headed discussions about a wide variety of topics. This is definitely one I'd love to read a larger take on from the HN crowd on. This isn't a status quo I'd like to see more people accept.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- equalunique 7y agoWar propaganda, i.e., information warfare, is absolutely relevant to HN & it's readers.