> the responsibility lies with whomever made—or okayed—-the system And generally speaking these are very different people, but that is besides the point. I am

> the responsibility lies with whomever made—or okayed—-the system And generally speaking these are very different people, but that is besides the point. I am still unsure why we are talking about testing and evaluating, as if we are only talking about failure cases. If I set the alarm clock for 7AM and it starts ringing at 4AM, the fault is with the clock designer. But if I set it for 4AM and it starts ringing at 4AM, it is somewhat silly of me to start blaming the clock designer for my disrupted sleep, isn't it? And we are not talking alarm clocks, we are talking about systems that make complex decisions based on hugely multidimensional data. Decisions that we provably cannot explain. There is no amount of testing and evaluation that can ensure that these systems are error free. But when they work, they do work well and provide a competitive edge over human analysts.