4 ms·
Honest question: Do you think this disadvantages people who have basically followed a traditional path? By that I mean, if you are a finance major from Harvard,
by chrisfinazzo 7y ago
Honest question: Do you think this disadvantages people who have basically followed a traditional path? By that I mean, if you are a finance major from Harvard, Yale, etc who goes to work at a large firm (say Goldman).
Is there a chance they might get looked down upon because of the emphasis on the "whole person" or finding "interesting" candidates.
Poets & Quants MBA odds doesn't talk about those kids, yet they will freely admit many of them end up at a top program for their MBA.
(For the record, this is not me personally, but still I wonder how these kinds of candidates get evaluated, given the current environment)
- alasdair_ 7y ago>Is there a chance they might get looked down upon because of the emphasis on the "whole person" or finding "interesting" candidates. There is a deliberate admissions emphasis on ensuring the class is as diverse (in terms of viewpoint and experience) as possible. An MBA class full of only people with finance degrees would be a poor experience for everyone.
- chrisfinazzo 7y agoNo question that people who are in that situation need to have some other defining traits that an admissions committee might find attractive, but I'm not sure if that sends a broad signal to people like, 'Don't pursue finance, we have enough of those people already'. Do any of these articles track what effect this kind of messaging has had on the number of MBA's choosing specific concentrations?