4 ms·

What? So, you're willing to engage in unethical activity, with a modicum of lip service to transparency? The entire idea of purging voters rolls is antithetical

• biomcgary 7y ago
  It is grossly unethical to purge valid voters in secret, but how is limiting voter rolls to those with a legal right to vote unethical? Should people be allowed to vote and have a say in the government of places they don't live? The reductio ad absurdum of this is allowing the whole world to vote for your local school board. Transparency and community engagement (through advocacy groups) helps ensure that valid voters are kept on the voter rolls. Don't knock Ohio for trying to take steps in the right direction.
  • jorblumesea 7y ago
    When people talking about voting rolls, it's really just a dog whistle for suppressing the votes of minority and underprivileged groups. The debate about "legal right to vote" and all of those arguments are mostly smoke screens for disenfranchisement. While it's true that we should have voting roles and ensure only people who are in the state should vote etc, that's absolutely not what people are doing or talking about when implementing voting systems. When the Republican party talks about these ideas, the end goal is skewing the voter turnout in their favor.
• Spivak 7y ago
  That's a extreme. Unless you want the government to track every citizen's whereabouts using activity to figure out if you actually still live here isn't unreasonable at all.