I'm pretty sure the latter is as you intimate, incorrect[0]. If it was correct, it apparently pertained to Mittag-Leffler, who is a very admirable human (with a

I'm pretty sure the latter is as you intimate, incorrect[0]. If it was correct, it apparently pertained to Mittag-Leffler, who is a very admirable human (with an amazing mustache) who was unfairly more or less forgotten[1] outside of complex analysis class. The fact that the "economics Nobel" isn't a real one, of course, is indisputable[2]. [0] http://almaz.com/nobel/why_no_math.html http://almaz.com/nobel/why_no_math.html [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6sta_Mittag-Leffler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6sta_Mittag-Leffler [2] for example https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/11/nobel-prize-economics-not-science-hubris-disaster https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/11/nobel-...