> I'm going to call it for what it is. Just another way of Google creeping on user data to improve their products. You called it spot on and then came to a con

> I'm going to call it for what it is. Just another way of Google creeping on user data to improve their products. You called it spot on and then came to a conclusion that fundamentally disagrees with the article: * This is Apple and Tencent, not Google * The author does not believe that Safe Search (Update API) is a way for Google to spy; or if it is, its privacy risk is marginal compared to the huge security win * The author's beef is not at all with this functionality, but in how it was communicated