3 ms·
Oh, it’s more than lack of familiarity. ‘“Nobel despised people who cared more about profits than society's well-being", saying that "There is nothing to indic
by mercutio2 7y ago
Oh, it’s more than lack of familiarity.
‘“Nobel despised people who cared more about profits than society's well-being", saying that "There is nothing to indicate that he would have wanted such a prize", and that the association with the Nobel prizes is "a PR coup by economists to improve their reputation".’ [0]
I’ve also heard rumors that Nobel had a personal animosity towards certain academic areas because of an affair his wife had with a professor, but I can’t find any good references for that.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Econom...
- scottlocklin 7y agoI'm pretty sure the latter is as you intimate, incorrect[0]. If it was correct, it apparently pertained to Mittag-Leffler, who is a very admirable human (with an amazing mustache) who was unfairly more or less forgotten[1] outside of complex analysis class. The fact that the "economics Nobel" isn't a real one, of course, is indisputable[2]. [0] http://almaz.com/nobel/why_no_math.html http://almaz.com/nobel/why_no_math.html [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6sta_Mittag-Leffler https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6sta_Mittag-Leffler [2] for example https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/11/nobel-prize-economics-not-science-hubris-disaster https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/11/nobel-...