3 ms·
Yes, this is why the Go language was a complete failure too. And C before that.
by beat 7y ago
Yes, this is why the Go language was a complete failure too. And C before that.
- cxr 7y agoThis reads as if you're willfully misunderstanding the other person's point just so you have an excuse to leave a snarky comment. There are lots of other forums for that.
- littlestymaar 7y agoTbf, C was big way before Google even existed (and nobody expects "Clang" to mean C, unlike D or Go). And even if it obviously didn't cause Go to fail, it's still something annoying when googling up about Go, because "Golang" doesn't always work.
- webgoat 7y agoYou speak as if you've never coded in Go before. If you've ever tried looking up information related to Go online, most of the time you'll find that results come up unrelated due to the short moniker. I've made a practice for myself to always search up "go" first and then "golang" because of how varying the search results tend to be, which leads me to also believe that much of the online knowledge related to Go tends to fall through the cracks due to bad SEO.