3 ms·
For reference, I'm mostly talking about brand-new projects, and purely from my perspective as a former .NET dev that still spends time with the local .NET commu
by EnderMB 7y ago
For reference, I'm mostly talking about brand-new projects, and purely from my perspective as a former .NET dev that still spends time with the local .NET community.
I've not met a single .NET dev that doesn't want to use .NET Core. Hell, if anything, a lot of them would love the opportunity to use .NET on a Unix system, and to use established tooling not available on Windows. The problem is that the tools they use aren't ported yet.
Umbraco is a key example, as the most popular .NET CMS in use today. It's a great CMS, but we're at least 1-2 years away from a .NET Core implementation, and probably even longer if we're hoping for a first-class Postgres/MySQL backed implementation. Until then, as you've rightly said, there's no need to switch to .NET Core.
- scarface74 7y agoI don’t care about being able to develop .Net apps on Linux. Being able to deploy to Linux is a game changer especially in the cloud. Anytime that you add Windows to a cloud environment you get hit with the triple whammy of slow startup times, increased licensing costs and increased resource requirements.